eDNA Papers

Are Environmental DNA Methods Ready for Aquatic Invasive Species Management?

Adam J Sepulveda, Nanette M Nelson, Christopher L Jerde, Gordon Luikart

Multiple studies have demonstrated environmental (e)DNA detections of rare and invasive species. However, invasive species managers struggle with using eDNA results because detections might not indicate species presence. We evaluated whether eDNA methods have matured to a point where they can be widely applied to aquatic invasive species management. We have found that eDNA methods meet legal standards for being admissible as evidence in most courts, suggesting eDNA method reliability is not the problem. Rather, we suggest the interface between results and management needs attention since there are few tools for integrating uncertainty into decision-making. Solutions include decision-support trees based on molecular best practices that integrate the temporal and spatial trends in eDNA positives relative to human risk tolerance.

Tracking an invasion front with environmental DNA

Abigail G. Keller, Emily W. Grason, P. Sean McDonald, Ana Ramón-Laca, Ryan P. Kelly

Data from environmental DNA (eDNA) may revolutionize environmental monitoring and management, providing increased detection sensitivity at reduced cost and survey effort. However, eDNA data are rarely used in decision-making contexts, mainly due to uncertainty around (1) data interpretation and (2) whether and how molecular tools dovetail with existing management efforts. We address these challenges by jointly modeling eDNA detection via qPCR and traditional trap data to estimate the density of invasive European green crab (Carcinus maenas), a species where, historically, baited traps have been used for both detection and control. Our analytical framework simultaneously quantifies uncertainty in both detection methods and provides a robust way of integrating different data streams into management processes. Moreover, the joint model makes clear the marginal information benefit of adding eDNA (or any other) additional data type to an existing monitoring program, offering a path to optimizing sampling efforts for species of management interest. Here, we document green crab eDNA beyond the previously known invasion front and find the value of eDNA data dramatically increases with low population densities and low traditional sampling effort, as is often the case at leading-edge locations. We also highlight the detection limits of the molecular assay used in this study, as well as scenarios under which eDNA sampling is unlikely to improve existing management efforts.

Evaluating bioinformatics pipelines for population-level inference using environmental DNA

Bastien Macé, Régis Hocdé, Virginie Marques, Pierre-Edouard Guerin, Alice Valentini, Véronique Arnal, Loïc Pellissier, Stéphanie Manel

Environmental DNA is mainly not only used at the interspecific level, to quantify spe- cies diversity in ecosystems, but can also be used to quantify intraspecific genetic variability, thus avoiding the need to sample individual tissue. However, errors in the amplification and sequencing of eDNA samples can blur this intraspecific signal and strongly over-estimate genetic diversity. Existing bioinformatics pipelines therefore need to be tested to evaluate whether reliable levels of intraspecific genetic variability can be derived from eDNA samples. Here, we compare the ability of twelve metabar- coding pipelines to detect intraspecific genetic variability combining five programs. All pipelines have common pre-processing steps, a processing data step using pro- grams among obiclean; DADA2; SWARM; and LULU. An additional chimera removal step is also investigated based on two programs (VSEARCH or DADA2). The case study was the natural intraspecific variation within Mullus surmuletus in experimental settings. We developed specific primers for this species, located on the mitochondrial D-loop fragment (barcode MS-DL06). Thirty-nine individuals were collected from the Mediterranean Sea, placed into four aquariums, and their DNA was sequenced on this marker to build an intraspecific reference database. After filtering the aquarium water, DNA was extracted, amplified, and sequenced using the primer pair developed. We then quantified the number of true haplotypes returned by each pipeline and its capacity to eliminate most of the erroneous sequences. We show that the program DADA2 with a two-parent chimeric sequence removal step is the best tool to estimate intraspecific diversity from eDNA. Furthermore, our approach was also able to detect true M. surmuletus haplotypes in two eDNA samples collected in the Mediterranean Sea. We conclude that the combination of an appropriate intrapopulation barcode and a denoising pipeline like DADA2 with a chimeric sequence removal step is promising to make population-level inference using environmental DNA possible.